Keep Governance and Safeguarding logo in yellow

Keep Governance and Safeguarding

The worst, best-kept secrets of 2023

Andy Churcher • July 16, 2024

Really valuable guidance that most people don't know exists

Two guidance documents from the Department of Education

One of the most important pillars of robust safeguarding arrangements is empowerment; educating everyone so they can make decisions about keeping themselves, and those they care for, safe from abuse, neglect and exploitation. 


That education should include information about the types of behaviours we are protecting ourselves from, yes, but also the arrangements which help to keep everyone safe and prevent spaces for abuse, neglect and exploitation to take place, unseen.


“Knowledge is power, knowledge is safety, knowledge is happiness” Thomas Jefferson


And so, it was encouraging last year when the Department for Education published two guidance documents which include specific expectations about safeguarding arrangements in out-of-school settings:


It's just a shame that almost everyone I talk to seems to know nothing about their existence!


I expect the Department of Education didn't have an easy time putting these documents together.  In the main, these aren't about statutory expectations and it's important to not paralyse providers and businesses with expectations that are too high for them to operate with.  But the basics are covered pretty well by both documents and include expectations around:

  • Safeguarding policy and staff behaviour policy
  • Procedures for reporting and managing safeguarding concerns
  • A named lead for safeguarding, made known to parents and carers
  • Reporting concerns to statutory agencies where appropriate, including allegations of harm against their staff or volunteers
  • Procedures and policies for whistleblowing, complaints and clear arrangements for accountability


The power of these documents in the hands of parents and carers would be huge.  If parents and carers regularly asked the questions in the "Before the first session, check the provider has..." section and were able to look for the signs listed in the "Warning signs to look out for..." section, before their children took part in the activities, providers who do not operate to standards which keep children safe  would find it a lot harder to hide, and to hide abuse, or would simply not be able to continue to operate.


Organisations who partner with Keep Governance and Safeguarding to deliver an independent and transparent safeguarding reporting process with Keep Equip can evidence how they go above and beyond, to meet the expectations that these documents put on them.  They all have a safeguarding webpage (or printed information given to all participants) which includes a link to a reporting tool for their participants and theor parents or carers which cover safeguarding and welfare concerns, concerns about the behaviour of staff and volunteers (including allegations of harm), whistleblowing and complaints.  Any concerns raised through here cannot be ignored as they are independently triaged, logged and monitored by Keep Equip.


These documents should be promoted widely as they form part of this key pillar of empowerment.


Find out more about about how Keep Equip can support you and your organisation on our website and get in touch if you are interested in exploring how we can support you.

By Andy Churcher December 17, 2024
Political ideology should never again be allowed to impact so disastrously on children
By Andy Churcher November 11, 2024
“Injustices are not the exclusive preserve of the unjust; they can be presided over by people who are in all other respects well-meaning and decent.”
By Andy Churcher September 10, 2024
It's been a long time coming... we even took a break in 2022 after Elon Musk bought Twitter. But its increasingly clear that we’ve both grown apart from each other and we can no longer stay together. Don’t get me wrong, from a safeguarding and online safety point of view, I cannot say with confidence that X is any worse than any of the other platforms. The only way social media platforms seem to be able to make the business model work is to avoid large workforces and rely on technology to moderate content. The online safety risks from inappropriate content are now well known. They also all seem committed to having some sort of encryption on their messaging services which, while apparently protecting our privacy, creates worrying space for abusers to communicate with each other and share abusive content. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be a way of doing business in the 21 st century without engaging with social media and so, at the moment at least, engaging with the market on these platforms is an uncomfortable necessity for many people working in safeguarding. However, for Keep Governance and Safeguarding, our relationship with X has moved from uncomfortable to untenable. Keep Governance and Safeguarding operates to reduce the risk of abuse, neglect and exploitation through supporting strategic leaders and safeguarding managers, driving improvement in organisational safeguarding arrangements and creating ways to empower children and adults at risk. Our work to deliver on this mission is guided by our values in which we commit to always being collaborative, knowledgeable, personable, thorough and respectful . As recent actions have shown, it doesn’t seem that Elon Musk and X are working to similar values to ours and I feel increasingly uncomfortable using the platform. Twitter had banned a number of far-right voices but these were lifted by Elon Musk after buying it. If it was just about championing free speech I am not sure I would have had a huge problem with this, but he has himself published provocative, disrespectful and ill-informed posts and commented on, and therefore promoted, some from these previously banned accounts. During the riots which for a week or so erupted in the UK following misinformation spread on social media about the awful murders of children in Stockport in August, Elon Musk shared posts which seem to have little or no basis in the truth. He also made provocative comments on other people’s posts, clearly intended to stoke fires rather than try contributing to a calming of the situation. In one such example, which he later deleted, Elon Musk shared an image on X which promoted a conspiracy theory about the UK building "detainment camps" on the Falkland Islands for rioters as if it were a headline from the Daily Telegraph. He is happy to share ill-informed, antagonistic and inaccurate views with over 197 million followers on X, and is at best agnostic about the consequences of these actions or, at worst, deliberately trying to stoke right-wing opinions to undermine otherwise stable democracies. He has reposted numerous posts which personally attack the leadership in Brazil, a country trying to ban X, demonstrating a huge lack of respect for the legal processes of another country and undermining their leaders with his written attacks. In Australia, where the government are trying to regulate content on social media platforms, their eSafety Commissioner was attacked in posts by Elon Musk which led to her receiving a huge amount of online abuse including death threats. He is also taking a group of major companies to court for boycotting X… surely it is the right of any company to decide what platforms they use to interact with the market. For me, the real problem here is the hugely amplified voice of the owner of a platform. With a large amount of money, he has bought himself the ability to speak directly to many people, and his voice unfortunately reflects values which clearly do not align to those of Keep Governance and Safeguarding. So, we will shortly stop posting our social media updates to X and will be adding Youtube to our suite of socials. I am grateful that as a company in most of our work we have the ability to choose who we work with.
Show More
Share by: