The missing piece: Part 2 What that piece looks like

Andy Churcher • April 4, 2023

Effective Boards demonstrate that safeguarding is important enough for them to be interested in

In the first part of this article, I outlined the evidence which tells us again and again that Boards must take leadership responsibility for the safeguarding arrangements in their organisations. Safeguarding is too important to treat as just another area of practice which can be held at arm’s length with assumptions being made that “we do it well enough”.

In lots of areas of life I like to turn to children’s fiction to help me understand them and, true to form, Dr Suess hid the answer deep in the Lorax when he wrote:

“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,

Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”

The verb care is defined as to think that something is important and to feel interested in it and that is exactly what we need Boards to do, in a very active, purposeful and consistent way, in order to ensure safeguarding arrangements are robust. Only then will our organisations be fully equipped to identify abuse and exploitation within the organisation and with those they serve whether they are beneficiaries, customers, students, pupils or patients. 

Depending on the work of your organisation, the depth of your safeguarding arrangements will vary, but all Boards should take responsibility for taking an active interest in those arrangements. By using ‘cares’ in that statement, Dr Suess also helpfully provides us with an anacronym for the five elements of robust safeguarding governance:

  • Culture and Organisational Identity – ensuring safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility whatever the primary purpose of their role or department
  • Assurance Testing – making sure the mechanisms that support the other four elements are providing an accurate picture of the effectiveness of safeguarding
  • Risk Management – actively overseeing and owning the safeguarding risks which are associated with the organisation’s work, especially those identified as being significantly high
  • Evaluation of Practice – scrutinising operational data which provides insight to the effectiveness of safeguarding work including numbers and types of concerns or incidents as well as data on the human resources work and training that maintains a vigilant culture
  • Strategy – owning and supporting a strategic plan for ongoing improvement in safeguarding practice.

We’re applying our expertise at Keep Safeguarding to support these elements of strong governance and ensuring that Board members, especially those who take specific responsibility for safeguarding, are supported to know what they need to know.


A photo of the inside wall of a building with metal girders with the elements of the C.A.R.E.S. model of strong governance
4 pics in a row: a child putting on ballet shoes, a football, a school child, a woman in wheelchair
By Andy Churcher April 14, 2025
In any setting, sports clubs, performing arts schools, education or care, trusted adults empower victims of abuse to come forward
By Andy Churcher March 21, 2025
The recently published DfE research report The link between attendance and attainment in an assessment year [1] outlines the significant benefits to schools and their pupils of improving attendance levels. I know that most schools are very proactive when it comes to supporting pupils to increase their attendance, and rightly so. Ofsted are interested in understanding this work during inspections with a recent report stating, “The school has addressed the significant challenges with pupils’ attendance and punctuality through effective actions to support and engage families.” But, of course, attendance isn’t the only factor impacting attainment in assessment. In fact, much research demonstrates that academic success measured by attainment is influenced by the whole life experience of the child. Ofsted’s 2022 paper Securing good attendance and tackling persistent absence [2] identified interdependencies between attendance and safeguarding. Effective and empathetic communication with parents is also an important tool in reducing absence. The same paper noted, “It is clear that leaders who have succeeded in raising attendance levels listen to parents properly and ask the right questions in order to find out why their children are not attending well enough.” There is also extensive research which helps us to understand the link between challenging behaviour and abuse, neglect and exploitation. The Truth Project, part of the Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse [3], gathered the insight of more than 6,000 victims and survivors of child sexual abuse. In its report, IICSA noted that victims and survivors knew their behaviour deteriorated as a result of being sexually abused sometimes, but not exclusively, as a deliberate attempt to communicate that they needed help, although sadly these signals were rarely recognised by others. And if behaviour can influence attainment then, of course, so can being the victim of abuse. The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel’s 2024 National review into child sexual abuse within the family environment [4] stated that “abuse was reported to have impacted children’s education in nearly a third of reviews”. And, if all that’s the case we can begin to see a complex mosaic of interdependencies for children which have the power to influence their risk of being a victim of abuse, their behaviour in school, their attainment throughout their education and their whole life experience. Safeguarding and wellbeing should never be seen as separate to any other part of a child’s experience. I wonder if school leaders take a truly strategic view of this mosaic which results in a co-ordinated approach which is greater than the sum of its parts. Or if work to support pupils is often too fragmented at an organisational level to be sufficiently effective in tackling these interdependencies. Last year the Department of Education published a rapid literature review [5] to shape the work of the longitudinal Education and Outcomes Panel Study (EOPS). It identified this mosaic of issues that impact educational outcomes categorising them into four themes: Theme 1: Children’s cognitive and non-cognitive capabilities and wellbeing Theme 2: Children with SEND and experience of social services Theme 3: Home environment Theme 4: Experiences of school
A photo of Victoria Climbie smiling at the camera which was used by Lord Laming in his inquiry
By Andy Churcher January 16, 2025
The Children's Wellbeing Bill puts right a quarter of a century of delay
Show More